Court Rules Ownership of Parent Company Intangibles Used By Subsidiaries in Iowa Does not Create Nexus – Denies Parent Inclusion in Consolidated Return: The parent and subsidiaries argued that the parent derived taxable income from the subsidiaries because it owned intangible property that was used by its subsidiaries, entitling it to join the subsidiaries’ Iowa consolidated income tax returns. Citing the reasoning of the Iowa Supreme Court in Myria Holdings Inc. v. Iowa Department of Revenue, No. 15-0296, 2017 WL 1103175 (Iowa 2017) the court reasoned that it was clear the Iowa subsidiaries and their intangible property were not enough to establish a taxable nexus with Iowa sufficient to remove the parent from the Iowa safe harbor provisions. Like Myria, by electing to have the subsidiaries taxed as corporations, the parent chose to receive not only the tax advantages of corporate taxation but any disadvantages as well. Thus, because the parent lacked a taxable nexus with Iowa, the department correctly concluded the parent could not join the consolidated return (Romantix Holdings, Inc. v. Iowa Department of Revenue, Iowa Court of Appeals, No. 16-0416, May 3, 2017.)